Opinion

Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

  • 288 A.2d 666
  • 1972 D.C. App. LEXIS 358
Court
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Filed
Mar 22, 1972
Status
Published
Author
Pair
On the bench
Hood, Gallagher
Cited by
16 cases
Authority
More cited than 9.3%

review of agency proceeding; where Board members visit scene, counsel are entitled to be present, and any facts acquired during the visit must be revealed at the hearing so that the parties may meet them by evidence or argument

How later courts described this case

  • review of agency proceeding; where Board members visit scene, counsel are entitled to be present, and any facts acquired during the visit must be revealed at the hearing so that the parties may meet them by evidence or argument
  • CAG has standing to seek D.C.Court of Appeals review under § 1 1510 of issuance of liquor license

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PAIR, Associate Judge

(concurring).

I concur in the conclusion reached by Judge Gallagher in the majority opinion but solely for the reason that the Board, in deciding that a license should issue, may have officially noticed and relied upon reports not made a part of the administrative record.

I am, however, forced to disassociate myself from any participation in Judge Gallagher’s holding that this court may overturn the Board’s finding of moral fitness, even though there is no challenge to such finding and no contrary evidence respecting moral fitness appears of record. See Braniff Airways, Inc. v. C. A. B., 126 U.S.App.D.C. 399, 409 , 379 F.2d 453, 463 (1967).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.