in support of its holding, the court stated that “the tendency has been that if we should err in ascertaining the intent of the legislature or the intendment of an insurance policy, we should err in favor of coverage for the insured”
How later courts described this case
- in support of its holding, the court stated that “the tendency has been that if we should err in ascertaining the intent of the legislature or the intendment of an insurance policy, we should err in favor of coverage for the insured”
- "In a wrongful death action ... [t]he persons entitled to recover such damages do not include the victim’s estate generally ...”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
*194 VAN der VOORT, Judge,
concurring:
I join the lead Opinion by President Judge CERCONE with the understanding on my part that we are not authorizing double recovery for the same items.