Opinion

People v. Nieves

  • 192 Ill. 2d 487
  • 249 Ill. Dec. 760
  • 737 N.E.2d 150
  • 2000 Ill. LEXIS 994
Court
Illinois Supreme Court
Filed
Jul 6, 2000
Status
Published
Author
Harrison
On the bench
Rathje, Harrison
Cited by
139 cases
Authority
More cited than 9.1%

finding the defendant waived reliance on plain error review where he “neither argue[d] that the evidence was closely balanced nor explain[ed] why the error [was] so severe that it must be remedied to preserve the integrity of the judicial process.”

How later courts described this case

  • finding the defendant waived reliance on plain error review where he “neither argue[d] that the evidence was closely balanced nor explain[ed] why the error [was] so severe that it must be remedied to preserve the integrity of the judicial process.”
  • finding that the defendant waived his plain-error argument where his argument merely consisted of "a single sentence asking us to employ the plain-error rule because the right to a fair death penalty sentencing hearing is a fundamental right."
  • finding that the Strickland standard applied where defense counsel “extensively cross-examined State’s witnesses, called a witness in support of his theory of defense, and forcefully argued that defendant should be found ‘not guilty’ ”
  • finding that the defendant waived his argument on appeal that his constitutional right to a fair death penalty sentencing hearing was violated by the introduction of hearsay evidence where he failed to object in the trial court

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

CHIEF JUSTICE HARRISON, concurring in part and dissenting in part:

I agree that Nieves’ murder conviction should not be disturbed. In my view, however, his sentence of death cannot be allowed to stand. For the reasons set forth in my partial concurrence and partial dissent in People v. Bull, 185 Ill. 2d 179 (1998), the Illinois death penalty law violates the eighth and fourteenth amendments to the United States Constitution (U.S. Const., amends. VIII, XIV) and article I, section 2, of the Illinois Constitution (111. Const. 1970, art. I, § 2). Nieves’ sentence of death should therefore be vacated and he should be sentenced to a term of imprisonment. 720 ILCS 5/9 — l(j) (West 1992). Because Nieves has previously been convicted of first degree murder, the term of his imprisonment must be natural life. 730 ILCS 5/5 — 8—l(a)(l)(c)(i) (West 1992).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.