Opinion

Dobson v. United States

  • 426 A.2d 361
  • 1981 D.C. App. LEXIS 219
Court
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Filed
Jan 30, 1981
Status
Published
Author
Newman
On the bench
Newman, Harris, Yeagley
Cited by
10 cases
Authority
More cited than 9.1%

trial court erred in denying motion for court-appointed psychiatrist where appellant was adjudged incompetent to stand trial, was receiving medication, had a history of psychiatric illness, and was hospitalized prior to the murder for the murder

How later courts described this case

  • trial court erred in denying motion for court-appointed psychiatrist where appellant was adjudged incompetent to stand trial, was receiving medication, had a history of psychiatric illness, and was hospitalized prior to the murder for the murder

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

NEWMAN, Chief Judge,

concurring:

I concur in the opinion of the court with the exception of footnote 9 supra, at p. 365. That footnote is palpable dictum and, in my judgment, merely adds further confusion to the meaning of our now famous footnote 5 in the case of Johnson v. United States, D.C.App., 387 A.2d 1084 (1978) (en banc).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.