Opinion

Commonwealth v. Vasquez

  • 255 Pa. Super. 545
  • 389 A.2d 111
  • 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3080
Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jul 12, 1978
Status
Published
Author
Spaeth
On the bench
Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Spaeth
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 9.1%

constitutional right to effective counsel during parole revocation hearing

How later courts described this case

  • constitutional right to effective counsel during parole revocation hearing

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

SPAETH, Judge,

concurring:

I concur, but note that until Commonwealth v. Stratton, 235 Pa.Super. 566 , 344 A.2d 636 (1975) (JACOBS, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which WATKINS, P. J., joined), is overruled, issues based on defects in (or, as here, the non-existence of) a Gagnon II hearing are not waived by failing to object at the probation revocation hearing. It is therefore unnecessary here to reach appellant’s argument on ineffectiveness of counsel.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.