The opinion
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Bell :
I dissent and would grant a new trial, because the jury’s verdict is not only against the great weight of the evidence * — far beyond even the value of the property fixed by the owner’s own witness and three times the value fixed by the Commonwealth’s witness — but is so shocking as to be clearly a miscarriage of Justice. Feltovich v. City of Sharon, 409 Pa. 314 , 186 A. 2d 247 ; Frisina v. Stanley, 409 Pa. 5 , 185 A. 2d 580 ; Bohner v. Eastern Express, Inc., 405 Pa. 463 , 175 A. 2d 864 ; Clewell v. Pummer, 388 Pa. 592 , 131 A. 2d 375 .
As to the award of a jury of view, see Mazur v. Commonwealth, 390 Pa. 148 , 134 A. 2d 669 ; as to the weight to be given the testimony of an owner of property, see Lenik Condemnation Case, 404 Pa. 257 , 172 A. 2d 316 .