Opinion

Palandro v. Bollinger

  • 409 Pa. 296
  • 186 A.2d 11
  • 1962 Pa. LEXIS 444
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Nov 28, 1962
Status
Published
Author
Bell
On the bench
Bell, Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Keim
Cited by
13 cases

The opinion

*300 Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bell:

I dissent — the jury specifically found plaintiff (and defendant) were guilty of negligence. If the admission of testimony that plaintiffs full salary and all of his expenses had been paid was error, it was clearly harmless error.

Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones joins in this dissenting opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.