Opinion

National Check v. First Fidelity Bank

  • 442 Pa. Super. 211
  • 658 A.2d 1375
  • 26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1198
  • 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1537
Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
May 31, 1995
Status
Published
Author
Tamilia
On the bench
Tamilia, Hoffman, Cercone
Cited by
5 cases

holding that it is the order sustaining preliminary objections and dismissing with prejudice a claim that is final

How later courts described this case

  • holding that it is the order sustaining preliminary objections and dismissing with prejudice a claim that is final

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

TAMILIA, Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent. I believe the trial court properly disposed of the issues in the case. On its face, the complaint is incredulous and appellant seeks to gain from a mere technical application of banking law, which standing alone could not result in the damages claimed. In any event, I believe the appeal is interlocutory and should be quashed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.