Opinion

Pattinato v. Moody

  • 248 Pa. Super. 32
  • 374 A.2d 1302
  • 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1960
Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Jun 29, 1977
Status
Published
Author
Voort
On the bench
Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Van Voort
Cited by
7 cases

misspelling of defendant’s name insufficient to support a petition to strike

How later courts described this case

  • misspelling of defendant’s name insufficient to support a petition to strike

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

VAN der VOORT, Judge,

concurring:

I join in the Opinion authored by Judge HOFFMAN with the understanding on my part that we are affirming the Order of the Court below with respect not only to Frank Wudkwych, but also with respect to M & W Construction Company and with the understanding on my part that the *41 case is remanded both for consideration and decision of Robert Moody’s Petition to Open the Judgment against him and for further proceedings consistent with our Opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.