Opinion

Attorney T. v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel

  • 519 Pa. 280
  • 547 A.2d 350
  • 1988 Pa. LEXIS 208
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Aug 10, 1988
Status
Published
Author
Nix
On the bench
Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Stout
Cited by
4 cases

The opinion

NIX, Chief Justice,

concurring.

I join in the majority opinion. However, I wish to take this occasion to make clear that this Court, to the extent its own Rules permit, stands ready to assist any sister state in policing the practice of law within its borders. We recognize and are ever sensitive to the fact that such administration frequently requires interstate cooperation.

Our disciplinary rules are such as to permit the interim suspension of an attorney, pending the final resolution of charges, if there is good reason to believe that his continued practice of law will cause immediate and substantial harm. An attorney may also be placed on inactive status. It would be within the power of disciplinary counsel to seek either of those remedies in an appropriate case. Upon the entry of an order for either of those temporary measures, our rules of confidentiality would not preclude our making *291 known that change of status to the proper authority in another state. However, the instant matter is not one in which disciplinary counsel has sought an interim suspension, or any other temporary measure, pending final resolution of the charges against the attorney involved.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.