Opinion

In Re Carey

  • 372 Mich. 378
  • 126 N.W.2d 727
Court
Michigan Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 5, 1964
Status
Published
Author
Dethmers
On the bench
Kavanagh, Souris, O'Hara, Smith, Kelly, Black, Dethmers, Adams
Cited by
49 cases
Authority
More cited than 8.7%

Distinguished

  • Distinguished by People v. Gallagher, 404 Mich. 429 (1979)

    The people contend that Carey is distinguishable because the sentencing for the Federal offense occurred before the state sentencing.
    Michigan Supreme CourtJan 3, 1979Read it

The opinion

Dethmers, J.

(dissenting). I am not persuaded that In re Huber, 334 Mich 100 , and In re lllova, 351 Mich 204 , should be overruled. For the reasons therein stated the writs of habeas corpus and certiorari heretofore issued herein should be dismissed and mandamus ought not to issue.

Kelly and Black, JJ., concurred with Dethmers, J.

Adams, J., did not take part in the decision of this case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.