holding that it is well established [that] attacks on the irregularity of extradition proceedings must be made in the asylum state
How later courts described this case
- holding that it is well established [that] attacks on the irregularity of extradition proceedings must be made in the asylum state
- stating “the manner in which a defendant is rendered before the court has no effect upon the court’s jurisdiction”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
MASON, Justice.
Although I still adhere to the position I took by joining Justice Rawlings’ dissent in Cole v. Holliday, 171 N.W.2d 603, 609 (Iowa 1969), I feel bound by the majority opinion in that case and therefore concur.