Opinion

Polascik v. Baldwin

  • 245 Pa. Super. 1
  • 369 A.2d 263
  • 1976 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2195
Court
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Nov 22, 1976
Status
Published
Author
Hoffman
On the bench
Spaeth, Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth
Cited by
16 cases
Authority
More cited than 8.6%

order denying petition to quash appeal from arbitrators held interlocutory and unappealable

How later courts described this case

  • order denying petition to quash appeal from arbitrators held interlocutory and unappealable

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

HOFFMAN, Judge,

concurring:

I agree with the Majority’s conclusion that this appeal must be quashed because the appeal to this Court was not filed in a timely manner. Caples v. Klugman, 202 Pa.Super. 517 , 198 A.2d 342 (1964); Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act, Act of July 31, 1970, P.L. 673, No. 223, art. V, § 502; 17 P.S. § 211.502(d). I do not join in the additional discussion because the Court engages in de novo factfinding based solely on speculation concerning the state of the record.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.