Opinion

In Re Berryman

  • 764 A.2d 760
  • 2000 D.C. App. LEXIS 291
  • 2000 WL 1877786
Court
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Filed
Dec 28, 2000
Status
Published
On the bench
Schwelb, Farrell, Reid
Cited by
45 cases

noting that except for the Addams rule, which is too inflexible, disbarment would not be warranted in the Berryman case where a lengthy suspension would have met fully the objectives of the disciplinary system

How later courts described this case

  • noting that except for the Addams rule, which is too inflexible, disbarment would not be warranted in the Berryman case where a lengthy suspension would have met fully the objectives of the disciplinary system
  • recognizing that "[o]ur misappropriation rule 'does not require scienter; rather, it is essentially a per se offense' "
  • collecting cases finding negligence where attorney was under the honest, but mistaken, belief that he or she was entitled to the use of funds that were in fact required to be maintained in trust
  • “absence of a prior disciplinary record ... even when coupled with other mitigating factors, is not a sufficient [sic] to overcome the presumption of disbarment”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

concurring:

I join entirely Judge Reid’s opinion for the court, but do not wish to be read as endorsing the current Board’s view that the Addams rule is too inflexible and should be reconsidered.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.