Opinion

Blevins v. Manufacturers Record Publishing Co.

  • 235 La. 708
  • 105 So. 2d 392
Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Filed
Oct 15, 1958
Status
Published
Author
Hamiter
On the bench
Simon, Tate, Fournet, Hamiter, McCaleb, Hawthorne, Tract
Cited by
80 cases

noting that when a deed conveying land contains an erroneous or ambiguous description, the parties to the deed are always permitted to reform the deed

How later courts described this case

  • noting that when a deed conveying land contains an erroneous or ambiguous description, the parties to the deed are always permitted to reform the deed
  • A sale by given bounds conveys only the property within such bounds, and acreage designations appended to such specific descriptions do not enlarge or restrict the grant described by the specific bounds.
  • reformation is normally unavailable to those who assert rights arising from an agreement to which they were not parties
  • deed may not be corrected to the prejudice of a third party

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

HAMITER, Justice

(concurring in part and dissenting in part).

For the written reasons which I assigned on the original hearing of this cause I agree that the suit should be dismissed as *793 to tract No. 2. And for the same reasons I am of the opinion that plaintiff’s demands should be rejected also as to tracts Nos. 1 and 3.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.