Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

  • 85 N.W.2d 211
  • 1957 N.D. LEXIS 145
Court
North Dakota Supreme Court
Filed
Oct 8, 1957
Status
Published
Author
Sathre
On the bench
Sathre, Burke, Morris, Grimson
Cited by
21 cases

“The essential elements of undue influence required to be shown to authorize the cancellation of the deed are that the victim is rendered incapable of acting on his own motives, which implies a weak mentality.”

How later courts described this case

  • “The essential elements of undue influence required to be shown to authorize the cancellation of the deed are that the victim is rendered incapable of acting on his own motives, which implies a weak mentality.”
  • examining capacity to execute a deed

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

SATHRE, Judge.

I adhere to my dissent heretofore written.

After the arguments on the rehearing and a further thorough study of the record I am still convinced that the analysis of the evidence and of the law in my dissenting opinion is correct and that as a court of equity we should have set that deed aside.

GRIMSON, Chief Justice.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.