stating the recipient of spousal support resisting its termination has the burden to show “extraordinary circumstances” to justify its continuation
How later courts described this case
- stating the recipient of spousal support resisting its termination has the burden to show “extraordinary circumstances” to justify its continuation
- "The imposition and length of an award of traditional alimony is primarily predicated on need and ability."
- noting that consideration of the value of premarital property “may justify a full credit, but it is not required”
- “Rehabilitative and reimbursement [support], for example, are often unaffected by remarriage.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
HUITINK, Judge
(specially concurring).
I concur in the result only.