Opinion

Wilty v. Jefferson Parish Democratic Executive Committee

  • 245 La. 145
  • 157 So. 2d 718
Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Filed
Dec 10, 1963
Status
Published
Author
Sanders
On the bench
Hamlin, McCaleb, Sanders, Summers, Hawthorne
Cited by
13 cases
Authority
More cited than 8.4%

husband and estranged wife as candidates for election to same office

How later courts described this case

  • husband and estranged wife as candidates for election to same office

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

SANDERS, Justice

(concurring).

In my opinion, the result reached in the instant case is correct.

Although unnecessary for the decision, the majority cites, with apparent approval, the' rule that by marriage a woman loses her maiden surname and takes her husband’s surname as hef legal name. I am unable to agree that marriage has this-effect under the law of Louisiana.

The common law fiction of merger between husband and wife, from which a change of the wife’s legal name arises, has never obtained in Louisiana. Rather, this state has followed the civil law doctrine. After marriage, the legal name of a woman continues tó' be her maiden name, or patronym. The surname of the husband is used only as a matter of custom to indicate the marital status of the wife. See Succession of Kneipp, 172 La. 411 , 134 So. 376 ; 1 McMahon Louisiana Practice p. 147; 1 Planiol, Traite Eléméntaire De Droit Civil (An English Translation by the Louisiana State Law Institute) No. 390.

Accordingly, I concur in the decree.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.