Opinion

Seibold v. State

  • 287 Ala. 549
  • 253 So. 2d 302
  • 1970 Ala. LEXIS 842
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Dec 17, 1970
Status
Published
On the bench
Simpson, Harwood, Blood-Worth, Maddox, McCall, Coleman, Lawson, Merrill, Remandment, Livingston, Bloodworth, Heflin
Cited by
72 cases

permitting expert testimony as to defendant's alleged insanity

How later courts described this case

  • permitting expert testimony as to defendant's alleged insanity
  • federal district court's interpretation of a decision of the United States Supreme Court not binding on this Court

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ON REHEARING

Application for rehearing overruled.

SIMPSON, MERRILL, COLEMAN, HARWOOD, BLOODWORTH, MADDOX and McCALL, JJ., concur.

HEFLIN, C. J., and LAWSON, J., dissenting.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.