Opinion

Anderson v. City of Council Bluffs

  • 195 N.W.2d 373
  • 1972 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 777
Court
Supreme Court of Iowa
Filed
Feb 25, 1972
Status
Published
Author
Uhlenhopp
On the bench
Moore, Mason, Becker, Legrand, Rees, Reynoldson, Uhlenhopp, Rawlings, Harris
Cited by
11 cases
Authority
More cited than 8.4%

trial court enjoys a wide discretion in reopening a case for the reception of additional evidence

How later courts described this case

  • trial court enjoys a wide discretion in reopening a case for the reception of additional evidence

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

UHLENHOPP, Justice

(specially concurring) .

One case relied on is Sheldon v. City of Burlingame, 146 Cal.App.2d 30 , 303 P.2d 344 . In that case the police officer was not simply using a patrol car as a taxi. The Rules and Regulations of the City of Bur-lingame permitted an officer to transport someone when circumstances indicated that such course was proper courtesy and proper police procedure. Under the circumstances shown, the court held a fact question was presented as to whether proper courtesy and police procedure authorized the officer to transport the individual.

The Sheldon case is not authority for a general proposition that a police officer may lawfully transport people, and they are not “guests,” under any and all circumstances.

RAWLINGS, J., joins in this special concurrence.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.