Opinion

People v. Jambor

  • 273 Mich. App. 477
  • 729 N.W.2d 569
Court
Michigan Court of Appeals
Filed
Mar 30, 2007
Status
Published
Author
Cooper
On the bench
Cavanagh, Cooper, Fitzgerald
Cited by
28 cases

fingerprint cards with no analysis that prints matched defendant

How later courts described this case

  • fingerprint cards with no analysis that prints matched defendant
  • fingerprint cards containing only “objective information” and not “subjee tive statements” are not testimonial

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

COOPER, EJ.

0concurring). I concur in the result only, because I am bound to do so by the current state of the law, but I would urge our Supreme Court to reconsider whether the boundaries of MRE 803(6) may or should really stretch so far as to include fingerprint cards prepared by a police officer in the course of an investigation of a crime scene. I would find that those cards properly fall within “matters observed by police officers” “in criminal cases,” and that MRE 803(8) ought to exclude them.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.