The opinion
Weaver, J.
(concurring). I concur with my colleagues that the prosecutor’s questioning of Ola Mae Reed was error requiring reversal because no cautionary instruction was given. However, I do not believe that the thoughtful analysis provided by People v Hall, 391 Mich 175, 179-183 ; 215 NW2d 166 (1974), needs revisiting, since in my view a prejudicial error of such magnitude cannot be deemed harmless.