holding circumstantial evidence sufficient to show robbery committed using and exhibiting pistol when complainant did not see gun but felt it poked into his side and defendant stated he had gun
How later courts described this case
- holding circumstantial evidence sufficient to show robbery committed using and exhibiting pistol when complainant did not see gun but felt it poked into his side and defendant stated he had gun
- holding litigant must object to trial court comments
- where defendant told the victim he had a gun, and defendant later fired shots at an off-duty police officer
- Opinion on State’s Motion for Rehearing
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
ODOM, Judge,
dissenting.
For the reasons stated in the opinion on original submission, I dissent.
TOM G. DAVIS and TEAGUE, JJ., join this opinion.