Opinion

Butt v. Evans Law Firm, P.A.

  • 351 Ark. 566
  • 98 S.W.3d 1
  • 2003 Ark. LEXIS 62
Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Filed
Jan 30, 2003
Status
Published
Author
Thornton
On the bench
Robert L. Brown
Cited by
11 cases

when the General Assembly amends a statute, this Court must presume it intended to effect a change to the prior law

How later courts described this case

  • when the General Assembly amends a statute, this Court must presume it intended to effect a change to the prior law
  • The contest of attorney’s fees after those fees had been paid is moot.

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Ray Thornton, Justice, concurring. I agree with the result reached by the majority opinion that this case should be reversed and remanded. However, I write separately because I think that the issue of attorney’s fees is not moot. In my opinion, that issue should be considered upon remand by the trial court.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.