Opinion

State v. Harrington

  • 10 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 31
  • 407 S.W.2d 467
  • 25 Oil & Gas Rep. 582
  • 1966 Tex. LEXIS 362
Court
Texas Supreme Court
Filed
Oct 12, 1966
Status
Published
Author
Griffin
On the bench
Smith, Griffin
Cited by
30 cases
Authority
More cited than 8.2%

observing that a statutory penalty regarding violations of various rules “is a civil penalty statute enacted for the primary purpose of promoting and encouraging law enforcement and deterring violations of the rules”

How later courts described this case

  • observing that a statutory penalty regarding violations of various rules “is a civil penalty statute enacted for the primary purpose of promoting and encouraging law enforcement and deterring violations of the rules”
  • considering whether “allegations and proof that [defendants] maintained the well in an unplugged state for a period of over 3,650 days amounts to no evidence that the well was ‘operated’ for that period of time”
  • interpreting statute to decide what elements plaintiff must prove to be entitled to recovery under same statute

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

GRIFFIN, Justice

(dissenting).

It is my opinion that the Court of Civil Appeals has correctly decided this case and I agree with that opinion. 385 S.W.2d 411 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.