Opinion

Fulco v. Fulco

  • 259 La. 1122
  • 254 So. 2d 603
  • 1971 La. LEXIS 3829
Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Filed
Nov 8, 1971
Status
Published
Author
Summers
On the bench
Tate, Summers, Sanders
Cited by
232 cases

Distinguished

  • Distinguished by Howes v. Howes, 388 So. 2d 1182 (1980)

    We conclude the consent judgment on March 9, 1979 is not a "considered judgment" and (3) of Fulco is inapplicable.
    Louisiana Court of AppealSep 9, 1980Read it
  • Distinguished by Johnson v. Johnson, 1980 La. App. LEXIS 3548 (1980)

    The father, on the other hand, contends the heavy burden of the Fulco rule is inapplicable to this situation because the mother had custody by virtue of a consent judgment rather than a “considered decree.
    Louisiana Court of AppealMar 11, 1980Read it

The opinion

SUMMERS, Justice

(dissenting).

I dissent for the reasons assigned by SANDERS, J.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.