Opinion

Brown v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance

  • 292 Ark. 558
  • 732 S.W.2d 130
  • 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2191
Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Filed
Jul 6, 1987
Status
Published
Author
Glaze
On the bench
Holt, Hickman, Purtle, Glaze
Cited by
13 cases
Authority
More cited than 8.1%

Overruled in part by Bailey v. Rose Care Center, 307 Ark. 14 (1991)

Later courts went against this

  • Overruled in part by Bailey v. Rose Care Center, 307 Ark. 14 (1991)

    Co., 292 Ark. 558, 732 S.W.2d 130 (1987), overruled in part by Bailey v. Rose Care Ctr., 307 Ark. 14, 817 S.W.2d 412 (1992) (injury was not a medical injury).
    Supreme Court of ArkansasOct 21, 19912 citing opinionsin partRead it

The opinion

Tom Glaze, Justice, concurring. I join the majority in its reversal of this cause, but I must disagree with the majority holding that Brown’s death was the result of a “medical injury.” The evidence here simply does not support such a holding. Some of my reasons for disagreeing with the majority on this point are already stated in the dissenting opinion found in Sexton v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., 275 Ark. 361, 364 , 631 S.W.2d 270, 272 (1982). Therefore, I merely adopt the dissenting views expressed in Sexton as supporting my concurrence in this case.

Hickman, J., joins in this concurrence.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.