Opinion

Walker v. State

823 S.W.2d 247
1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 185
1991 WL 183123

Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed: Sep 18, 1991
Status: Published
Author: McCORMICK
On the bench: Clinton, Miller, McCormick, White, Benavides, Maloney
Cited by: 49 cases
Authority: More cited than 8.1%

Overruled — as noted by a later court

Later courts went against this

Overruled — as noted by a later court
Consequently, Walker is no longer controlling authority on the sufficiency of
medium confidence

Distinguished

Distinguished by Chatman v. State, 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 1141 (1992)
In order to determine if Jones and Walker are distinguishable from the case before us, we must analyze the authority cited in Jones: Oliver v. State, 160 Tex. Crim. 222, 268 S.W.2d 467 (1954); McCuin v. State, 505 S.W.2d 827 (Tex.Crim.App.1974); and Apodaca v. State, 589 S.W.2d 696 (Tex.Crim.App.1979).
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)Apr 8, 1992Read it

The opinion

McCORMICK, Presiding Judge,

dissenting.

For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Ex parte Haron Stephens, 806 S.W.2d 812 (Tex.Cr.App.1991), I dissent to the entry of the order of acquittal.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.