holding that whether goodwill is marital property is a factual question and that a party, to establish goodwill as marital property and divisible as such, must produce evidence establishing the salability or marketability of that goodwill as a business asset of a professional practice
How later courts described this case
- holding that whether goodwill is marital property is a factual question and that a party, to establish goodwill as marital property and divisible as such, must produce evidence establishing the salability or marketability of that goodwill as a business asset of a professional practice
- court found trial court erred in the award of certain property interests, and in reversing, directed the trial court to consider the alimony issue since any adjustment of the property might also affect the trial court’s earlier decision on alimony
- cash bonus earned during marriage was marital property
- “[A]ppellee’s employment agreement with [his employer] required the company to pay appellee an incentive bonus based on his productivity and the profitability of the company.” (Emphasis in original.)
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Hickman and Purtle, JJ., concur (see Meinholz v. Meinholz, 283 Ark. 509 , 678 S.W.2d 348 (1984)).
Special Justice Charles Walker joins in the opinion.