reversed on other grounds Kildow v. Baldwin Piano & Organ, 333 Ark. 335, 969 S.W.2d 190 (1998)
How later courts described this case
- reversed on other grounds Kildow v. Baldwin Piano & Organ, 333 Ark. 335, 969 S.W.2d 190 (1998)
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Margaret Meads, Judge, concurring. I concur with the majority opinion, which reverses the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission in this case for lack of substantial evidence. That finding, in my judgment, makes it unnecessary for us to reach appellant’s argument that the Commission’s interpretation of Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-102 (5)(A)(ü)(a) (1996), is erroneous.
The majority opinion clearly and logically reaches the conclusion that reasonable minds could not agree that appellant’s assembly fine work does not qualify as “rapid repetitive” in the ordinary and generally accepted meaning of the words, and I agree with it. Having so determined, there is no need for interpretation of the statute.
Neal, J., joins in this concurrence.