Opinion

Welch v. State

  • 263 Ala. 57
  • 81 So. 2d 901
  • 1955 Ala. LEXIS 572
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
May 12, 1955
Status
Published
Author
Mayfield
On the bench
Merrill, Livingston, Lawson, Stakely, Mayfield
Cited by
32 cases

The opinion

MAYFIELD, Justice

(dissenting).

The chief prosecuting officer for the State is prohibited from doing by indirection that which he is barred from doing directly. 'The statement of the solicitor that the “defense has offered no evidence” effectively •directed and focused the attention of the jury upon the fact that the defendant had exercised his constitutional privilege .against self incrimination. This is expressly forbidden by our statute. For this reason I must respectfully dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.