Opinion

Humphrey v. Knox

  • 244 S.W.2d 309
  • 1951 Tex. App. LEXIS 1781
Court
Court of Appeals of Texas
Filed
Nov 30, 1951
Status
Published
Author
Bond
On the bench
Bond, Cramer
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.9%

The opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

BOND, Chief Justice.

In passing on appellant’s motion for rehearing, we employ the Comments on class actions in 25 Texas Law Review 64, et seq., pertinent, we think, in many respects to the situation in the present suit; particularly the analysis of the holdings in Richardson v. Kelly, 144 Tex. 497 , 191 S.W.2d 857 . We find no reason to change our conclusion reached in our original opinion; appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.

CRAMER, J., dissents.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.