Opinion

Stewart v. Washington

  • 301 F. Supp. 610
  • 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9962
Court
District Court, District of Columbia
Filed
Jun 4, 1969
Status
Published
Author
Smith
On the bench
Wright, Leventhal, Smith
Cited by
10 cases

stating that the No Religious Test Clause “recoil[s] from the odious test oaths that emerged in Britain in the 17th century, and which disqualified from public office all Catholics and non-conformists not subscribing to the doctrines of the Church of England”

How later courts described this case

  • stating that the No Religious Test Clause “recoil[s] from the odious test oaths that emerged in Britain in the 17th century, and which disqualified from public office all Catholics and non-conformists not subscribing to the doctrines of the Church of England”
  • striking down loyalty statute for federal employees, 5 U.S.C. § 7311, on Brandenburg-type grounds

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

*614 JOHN LEWIS SMITH, Jr., District Judge,

concurs in the result but feels that this case like Haskett v. Washington, should be decided without holding section 7311 unconstitutional.

JUDGMENT

In accordance with our memorandum opinion of June 4, 1969, it is hereby adjudged, decreed, and ordered, that defendants herein be enjoined from requiring plaintiff to sign the affidavit set forth in plaintiff’s complaint as a prerequisite to assuming her position of substitute teacher in Project 470 of the District of Columbia School System.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.