Opinion

Oliphint v. Christy

  • 157 Tex. 1
  • 299 S.W.2d 933
  • 1957 Tex. LEXIS 557
Court
Texas Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 13, 1957
Status
Published
Author
Norvell
On the bench
Smith, Norvell
Cited by
17 cases

`final adjudication' in article 7.14, section 23 of the Election Code means determination by judge on competent evidence

How later courts described this case

  • `final adjudication' in article 7.14, section 23 of the Election Code means determination by judge on competent evidence

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Mr. Justice Norvell

dissenting.

To my mind the clause placed within the parenthesis in Article 7.14, Section 23, Vernon’s Annotated Election Code, renders such section inapplicable to the facts disclosed by the present record. These words are: “(after the casting of such fraudulent or illegal casting of a ballot has been established by final adjudication before a court of competent jurisdiction and by competent evidence).” A “final adjudication” could only take place in a proceeding held anterior to the election contest itself. This construction may render the statute largely ineffective, but we are hardly at liberty to disregard the well established and recognized meaning of the term “final adjudication.” 16 Words & Phrases 583.

I accordingly dissent from the order affirming the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals.

Opinion delivered March 13, 1957.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.