Opinion

Caldwell v. State

  • 267 Ark. 1053
  • 594 S.W.2d 24
Court
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Filed
Feb 13, 1980
Status
Published
Author
Newbern
On the bench
Penix, Wright, Newbern
Cited by
22 cases

Expert opinion as to the reliability of a sexual abuse victim’s perception and recall held to be inadmissible as invading the province of the jury

How later courts described this case

  • Expert opinion as to the reliability of a sexual abuse victim’s perception and recall held to be inadmissible as invading the province of the jury

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

David Newbern, Judge, concurring. Although I concur in the result reached, I cannot agree with that part of the majority opinion which characterizes the defense counsel’s cross examination of the prosecuting witness as “hounding and badgering” and “picayune.”

Chief Judge Wright joins in this concurring opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.