holding that an indication that the original plaintiff was "one of the surviving children” provided sufficient notice to defendant of "the reasonable possibility that 'another surviving child [of defendant] would be entitled to recover”
How later courts described this case
- holding that an indication that the original plaintiff was "one of the surviving children” provided sufficient notice to defendant of "the reasonable possibility that 'another surviving child [of defendant] would be entitled to recover”
- “Because medical malpractice actions are governed by the specific provisions of [the Medical Malpractice Act (the “Act”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
WEIMER, J.,
dissenting.
|,I respectfully dissent from the opinion on rehearing for the reasons stated in my concurrence following original hearing.