Opinion

Prejean v. Maintenance Enterprises, Inc.

  • 2008 La.App. 4 Cir. 0364
  • 8 So. 3d 766
  • 2009 La. App. LEXIS 460
  • 2009 WL 792186
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
Mar 25, 2009
Status
Published
Author
McKAY
On the bench
Paul A. Bonin
Cited by
27 cases

The opinion

McKAY, J.,

concurs.

hi respectfully concur with the majority opinion and would affirm the trial court’s judgment. A genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the work done by Mr. Prejean for MEI was an integral part of or essential to the ability of Murphy to produce and distribute petroleum products. Accordingly, summary judgment is not appropriate in this case.

TOBIAS, J., dissents.

hi respectfully dissent for the reasons assigned by Judge Lombard.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.