Opinion

Mitchell v. Villien

  • 2008 La.App. 4 Cir. 1470
  • 19 So. 3d 557
  • 2009 La. App. LEXIS 1589
  • 2009 WL 2751145
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
Aug 26, 2009
Status
Published
Author
Armstrong
On the bench
Armstrong, Lombard, Bonin
Cited by
12 cases

finding that medical provider who was subject to mandatory reporting requirement for gunshot wounds presented for treatment enjoyed a qualified or conditional privilege against civil liability when he reported to police a suspected gunshot wound, if in good faith he had a subjective belief in the accuracy of his report at the time

How later courts described this case

  • finding that medical provider who was subject to mandatory reporting requirement for gunshot wounds presented for treatment enjoyed a qualified or conditional privilege against civil liability when he reported to police a suspected gunshot wound, if in good faith he had a subjective belief in the accuracy of his report at the time
  • reversing a denial a motion for summary judgment and finding there was no evidence to show that the doctor reported a suspected gunshot wound to the police in bad faith

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ARMSTRONG, C.J.,

concurs in the result.

hi respectfully concur in the result reached in the majority opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.