addressing a claim that the circuit court violated Rule 24.02 on appeal of a Rule 29.07(d) motion to withdraw a guilty plea
How later courts described this case
- addressing a claim that the circuit court violated Rule 24.02 on appeal of a Rule 29.07(d) motion to withdraw a guilty plea
- explaining the procedural history of Taylor's case
- approving of the refusal to allow Taylor to withdraw his plea and undergo jury sentencing after his case was remanded
- counsel’s allegedly inadequate investigation of potential mitigation evidence and failure to call additional mitigation witnesses did not prejudice defendant
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
*226 HOLSTEIN, Chief Justice,
dissenting.
For the reasons expressed at length in State v. Nunley, 923 S.W.2d 911 (Mo. banc 1996), I respectfully dissent.