Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. Reed & Prince Mfg. Co.

  • 118 F.2d 874
  • 8 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 478
  • 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 4125
Court
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Filed
Apr 2, 1941
Status
Published
Author
McLELLAN
On the bench
Magruder and Mahoney, Circuit Judges, and McLellan, District Judge
Cited by
41 cases

“We therefore think that under the circumstances here disclosed the broader prohibition as appears in . . . the Board’s order is within the discretion of the Board and should be enforced.” (emphasis added)

How later courts described this case

  • “We therefore think that under the circumstances here disclosed the broader prohibition as appears in . . . the Board’s order is within the discretion of the Board and should be enforced.” (emphasis added)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

McLELLAN, District Judge

(concurring.)

To the extent that the majority opinion indicates there was sufficient evidence to warrant enough of the Board’s findings to support the order, as modified, I concur therein and think the decree there directed should be entered.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.