upholding 1975 Act against facial challenge because Legislature adequately set standards against which thorough and efficient education could be judged
How later courts described this case
- upholding 1975 Act against facial challenge because Legislature adequately set standards against which thorough and efficient education could be judged
- 6 Justices + 1 judge temporarily assigned
- describing the Act’s funding scheme in detail
- power to implement the constitutional guarantee of a “thorough and efficient” school system
Written by the judges who cited it.
Distinguished
Distinguished by Morris Cty. Fair Hous. Council v. Boonton Tp., 209 N.J. Super. 393 (1985)
" Ibid. Therefore, the moratorium is inapplicable to litigation brought by a nonprofit public interest organization.
The opinion
Schreibek, J.
(concurring). I join in the majority opinion, but I believe that the order to show cause mentioned in Part IY of the opinion should include, in addition to the remedies contemplated by paragraphs A, B and C thereof, that suggested by Justice Pashman under which collection of local taxes for the support of the public schools would be enjoined and in lieu thereof a state school tax would be determined and applied to the ratables throughout the State. *476 The funds collected would then be disbursed through the State Treasurer, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Education, to the respective school districts.