Opinion

Uniontown Newspapers, Inc. v. Roberts

  • 576 Pa. 231
  • 839 A.2d 185
  • 2003 Pa. LEXIS 2472
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Dec 24, 2003
Status
Published
Author
Cappy
On the bench
Cappy, Castille, Nigro, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Lamb
Cited by
45 cases

overruling the Commonwealth Court order entered in original jurisdiction action that sustained preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer

How later courts described this case

  • overruling the Commonwealth Court order entered in original jurisdiction action that sustained preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer
  • reasoning a legislator’s deci sion to selectively disclose phone records did not involve State action
  • providing that policy considerations do not lie with the courts, but are reserved for the legislative body to resolve.
  • “Since [the plaintiffs] were not the moving party, their failure to respond to preliminary objections does not waive the issue.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

*254

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY.

I join the majority insofar as it determines that there is no right of access to the records at issue here, and that Appellee’s actions are not protected under the immunity of the Speech or Debate Clause. I dissent from the majority’s decision to reinstate those claims which were raised pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , since I agree with Mr. Justice Lamb that no state action is implicated by Appellee’s acts. 1 Thus, I would affirm the order of the Commonwealth Court.

Justice CASTILLE joins this concurring and dissenting opinion.

. Contrary to the majority, I would find that this issue of whether Appellee was acting under color of law is properly before the court, since Appellee addressed the issue in his brief in support of his preliminary objections, and the Commonwealth Court evaluated the issue on the merits.

. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 provides:

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.