Opinion

Bailey v. Commerce Union Bank

  • 223 Ark. 686
  • 269 S.W.2d 314
Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Filed
May 17, 1964
Status
Published
Author
Smith
On the bench
George Rose Smith
Cited by
7 cases

The opinion

Geieein Smith, Chief Justice, dissenting. My objection goes to the majority’s action in overruling the Miner case. A decision that lias landinarked a particular statute for more than half a century should not be cast aside with conclusions that in the composite amount to a declaration that “We don’t like it!” We have frequently said that judicial construction of a statute will be presumed to have come to the attention of the general assembly, and acquiescence by that body for a long period of time where the subject-matter was of legislative address carries with it the implication of assent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.