Opinion

Geurin Contractors, Inc. v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.

  • 5 Ark. App. 229
  • 636 S.W.2d 638
  • 1982 Ark. App. LEXIS 844
Court
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Filed
Aug 25, 1982
Status
Published
Author
Glaze
On the bench
Cloninger, Glaze
Cited by
13 cases

recognizing the increased breadth of the definition of “property damage” introduced in the more recent form of policy

How later courts described this case

  • recognizing the increased breadth of the definition of “property damage” introduced in the more recent form of policy

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Tom Glaze, Judge, dissenting. I dissent. Since I disagree that appellant is entitled to damages under the insurance policy, I necessarily disagree that it is entitled to attorneys’ fees.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.