Opinion

Croll v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

511 Pa. 79
511 A.2d 1311
1986 Pa. LEXIS 807

Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed: Jun 20, 1986
Status: Published
Author: Larsen
On the bench: Zappala, Hutchinson, Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Papadakos
Cited by: 5 cases

The opinion

LARSEN, Justice,

dissenting.

I dissent. As the original record supported awarding benefits to Henry Croll (now to Evelyn Croll, his widow), I *88 would affirm the original award of benefits. To remand, when there was no intrinsic error in the prior proceedings for the purpose of giving the employer a second opportunity to litigate the matter, violated Croll’s due process rights.

PAPADAKOS, J., joins in this dissenting opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.