Opinion

Furlong v. United States

  • 152 F. Supp. 238
  • 138 Ct. Cl. 843
  • 1957 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 87
Court
United States Court of Claims
Filed
Jun 5, 1957
Status
Published
Author
Jones
On the bench
Jones, Littleton, Whitaker, Madden, Laramore
Cited by
35 cases

noting that this court “cannot acquire jurisdiction of [a disability retirement] claim until after the board and the Secretary have acted”

How later courts described this case

  • noting that this court “cannot acquire jurisdiction of [a disability retirement] claim until after the board and the Secretary have acted”
  • “[S]ince our jurisdiction could not be invoked until after the retiring board and the Secretary had acted, the statute of limitations on a suit in this court did not begin to run until they had acted[.]”
  • “jurisdiction is conferred by Congress, not on this court, but on retiring-boards and the Secretaries of the three armed services, to decide an officer’s right to retirement for physical disability * * *”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

JONES, Chief Judge

(concurring in part).

I concur, but am inclined to the opinion that any recovery in this court should be limited to six years previous to filing of the suit.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.