noting that “we are to be guided by reasonableness and are not to be entangled in attempts to microscopically align the facts of the case at bar with those of prior cases having inevitably differing factual circumstances”
How later courts described this case
- noting that “we are to be guided by reasonableness and are not to be entangled in attempts to microscopically align the facts of the case at bar with those of prior cases having inevitably differing factual circumstances”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
KELLY, Associate Judge,
dissenting:
In my judgment appellant’s arrest in this case was without probable cause. See Campbell v. United States, D.C.App., 273 A.2d 252 (1971); Daugherty v. United States, D.C.App., 272 A.2d 675 (1971). I would reverse the conviction.