Opinion

Dodd v. Meno

  • 870 S.W.2d 4
  • 1994 WL 6718
Court
Texas Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 9, 1994
Status
Published
Author
Gonzalez
On the bench
Phillips, Spector, Gonzalez, Hecht, Cornyn, Enoch, Hightower, Doggett, Gammage
Cited by
124 cases

recognizing that an administrative agency’s construction of a statute that it is charged with enforcing is entitled to “serious consideration,” so long as the construction is reasonable and does not contradict the statute’s plain language

How later courts described this case

  • recognizing that an administrative agency’s construction of a statute that it is charged with enforcing is entitled to “serious consideration,” so long as the construction is reasonable and does not contradict the statute’s plain language
  • holding that construction of statute by agency charged with its enforcement entitled to serious consideration, so long as construction is reasonable and does not contradict plain language of statute
  • recognizing that TCNA should be construed broadly as remedial statute but deferring to “Commissioner’s reasonable determination in an area where he possesses considerable authority and expertise”
  • providing that construction of a statute by the administrative agency charged with its enforcement is entitled to serious consideration, if the construction is reasonable and does not contradict the plain language of the statute

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

GONZALEZ, Justice,

concurring.

Ms. Dodd, a long-time school nurse with the Wink-Loving Independent School District, with no teaching duties or teaching certificate, filed suit against the District because her employment contract was not renewed and the District did not give her any reasons for its decision. Whether this is good or bad policy is not the issue. The real issue is whether the legislature has given school nurses the same procedural rights regarding notice of reasons for non-renewal of employment contracts that the legislature has given teachers. I agree with the majority of this Court and with Chief Justice Carroll and Justices Jones and Kidd of the Austin Court of Appeals that the legislature did not, intentionally or unintentionally, give school nurses those rights. It would be sound public policy for the legislature to grant school nurses the rights included in the Term Contract Nonrenewal Act — however, this is pot our decision to make. We should not re-write statutes under the guise of interpreting them, as the dissent would have us do. I thus join in the opinion and concur in the judgment of the Court.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.