arising under borough code provisions, since repealed but containing language still found in provisions appli cable here
How later courts described this case
- arising under borough code provisions, since repealed but containing language still found in provisions appli cable here
- same individual should not have served on board seeking suspension of police officer and Civil Service Commission determining officer’s suspension appeal
- arising under borough code provisions, since repealed but containing language still found in provisions appli *458 cable here
- one of the officials who initiated civil service disciplinary proceeding also sitting as a member of a civil service commission; civil service action reversed, not remanded
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts:
It is my view that this Court does not have jurisdiction of this appeal. Neither the parties to this action nor the majority has cited one similar case which this Court has heard. Nor has my research revealed any. Therefore, the appropriate recourse would be for us to either quash the appeal or remit it to the Superior Court; that Court has initial appellate jurisdiction in civil service appeals unless they come under this Court’s equity jurisdiction. 17 P.S. §184.1. * In light of this, I do not find it necessary to discuss or decide the merits of this controversy.
“All actions arising from proceedings and orders of any commission or administrative agency, except as otherwise provided by statute . . . .”