Opinion

Cleveland Automobile Co. v. United States

  • 70 F.2d 365
  • 5 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 1594
  • 13 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 986
  • 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 4162
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Mar 6, 1934
Status
Published
On the bench
Moorman, Hickenlooper, and Simons, Circuit Judges
Cited by
16 cases
Authority
More cited than 7.2%

The opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and SI-MONS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It was perhaps not accurate to say that the taxpayer here had a right of appeal to the Board of Tax Appeals from the Commissioner’s findings on special assessment since no deficiency was found. That question was reserved in Blair, Commissioner, v. Oester-lein Machine Co., 275 U. S. 220 , 48 S. Ct. 87 , 72 L. Ed. 249 , and not decided. We find no reason to withdraw the opinion or to in any other respect modify it.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.